P.J. Washington's Impact and Dallas's Offensive Challenges
P.J. Washington made two critical 3-pointers and scored eight points during a crucial 22-2 run for the Mavericks. Yet, despite these efforts, Dallas found themselves in desperate need of scoring beyond Luka Doncic and Kyrie Irving.
The Boston Celtics, throughout the series, have consistently displayed a more balanced approach, showcasing multiple leading scorers in every game. This depth and versatility have proven to be a significant advantage over the Mavericks' more star-reliant offense.
Dallas's Struggles Against Boston's Defensive Strategy
Dallas struggled against Boston's defensive strategy, which notably did not involve doubling Doncic. Instead, the Celtics adopted a single coverage approach on both Doncic and Irving. This tactic effectively limited the effectiveness of Dallas's role players, who typically thrive when their superstar ball-handlers create opportunities for them.
Throughout the series, these role players have faltered. The ability to stifle Dallas’s secondary scoring options has been a cornerstone of Boston's game plan.
Boston’s Depth vs. Dallas’s Reliance on Stars
Boston's bench players have outperformed those of Dallas, with this depth proving to be a key factor in the series. The Celtics have devised a balanced team approach, in stark contrast to Dallas's heavy reliance on their star players. While Boston's role players are allowed to stay within their strengths, Dallas's supporting cast struggles mightily when their superstars are neutralized.
The decline of Tim Hardaway Jr. and the inexperience of Jaden Hardy have only exacerbated Dallas's issues, further hurting their offensive rhythm. The team's system seems ill-equipped to support a consistent scoring rhythm for the role players.
Key Quotes Illustrating the Series Dynamics
P.J. Washington's 3-pointer with 1:04 remaining in the third quarter was notably the first non-Doncic or Irving Maverick shot made all night. This highlights the over-reliance on the two stars.
The series has seen four of the top six scorers coming from the Celtics, showcasing their balanced scoring approach. Additionally, the Mavericks, who averaged more than 16 corner 3-point attempts per game, found that Boston's strategy effectively neutralized this key aspect of their offense.
The Celtics' approach involved disarming every Maverick except for Doncic and Irving by taking away the corner shots and forcing lesser threats to step up. This strategy showcases how Boston was able to neutralize Dallas's threats through smart defensive planning.
Quotes from the series paint a vivid picture: "If Jones wants to fire from the top of the arc, or if Washington wants to post someone up? The Celtics can live with that." This statement underscores Boston's confidence in their defensive scheme.
Potential Solutions for Dallas
Perhaps a third true shot-creator could solve some of these issues for the Mavericks. Unfortunately, the timing has not worked out for Dallas, as it's currently a year too early for Hardy and a year too late for Hardaway.
Boston's Balanced Approach
While the Celtics might not have a top-five player like Doncic, they possess at least five—and perhaps six—players who could credibly be considered among the top 50 in the league. This depth has been critical to their success. Players like Sam Hauser have made significant contributions, with Hauser having made more 3-pointers in the series (five) than every Mavericks reserve combined (four).
The Celtics' strategy involves asking less of their supporting players, allowing them to thrive in roles that suit their strengths. By successfully devising a roster and scheme in which nobody is asked to do more than they are capable of, Boston has set themselves up for success.
Dallas's Shortcomings
Conversely, the Mavericks are on the verge of losing the series due to their supporting cast of specialists being easily neutralized. The need for a reliable third shot-creator for Dallas is evident, but the current roster does not seem up to the challenge.
In summary, Boston's depth and balanced approach have enabled them to flourish, while Dallas's heavy reliance on their superstars has left them vulnerable when those stars are neutralized. It is a classic case of a well-rounded team versus a team dependent on a few superstars, with the former proving to be more effective in this series.